To Learn Is to Understand and to Understand Is to Innovate: An Inter-intra Socio-epistemological Process

Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):435-436 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Learning How to Innovate as a Socio-epistemological Process of Co-creation: Towards a Constructivist Teaching Strategy for Innovation” by Markus F. Peschl, Gloria Bottaro, Martina Hartner-Tiefenthaler & Katharina Rötzer. Upshot: This commentary emphasizes the three levels of a teaching methodology designed to scaffold conceptual autonomy and innovation on the part of graduate students with diverse areas of expertise

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Going Beyond Novelty: Innovation as a Market Process.J. Richards - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):438-439.
Radical Constructivism in the Classroom: Tensions and Balances.L. L. Hatfield - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):433-435.
Interacting with the Envisioned Future as a Constructivist Approach to Learning.F. Kragulj - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):439-440.
The Need for Varieties of Perspectives.H. Gash - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):437-438.
Learning How to Innovate as a Socio-epistemological Process of Co-creation: Towards a Constructivist Teaching Strategy for Innovation.M. F. Peschl, G. Bottaro, M. Hartner-Tiefenthaler & K. Rötzer - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):421-433.
Emergent innovation—a socio-epistemological innovation technology. Creating profound change and radically new knowledge as core challenges in knowledge management.Markus F. Peschl & Thomas Fundneider - 2008 - In Lytras M. D. (ed.), The Open Knowledge Society: A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto. Springer. pp. 101-108.
Modes of Knowing and Modes of Coming to Know Knowledge Creation and Co-Construction as Socio-Epistemological Engineering in Educational Processes.M. F. Peschl - 2006 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (3):111-123.
Authors' Response: Challenges in Studying and Teaching Innovation: Between Theory and Practice.M. F. Peschl, G. Bottaro, M. Hartner-Tiefenthaler & K. Rötzer - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):440-446.
Integrating Two Epistemological Goals: Why Shouldn’t We Give It Another Chance?Shinobu Kitayama - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):420-428.
To innovate or not to innovate? That is the question.Marc D. Hauser - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Managing to Innovate in Higher Education.Harold Silver - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):145 - 156.
Signs and the process of interpretation: sign as an object and as a process.Adalira Sáenz-Ludlow - 2007 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (3):205-223.
Philosophical foundations for the practices of ecology.William A. Reiners - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Jeffrey Alan Lockwood.
Impacts of Cultural Capital on Student College Choice in China.Lan Gao - 2011 - Lexington Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-15

Downloads
10 (#1,198,690)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references