Quantified np's and donkey anaphora

Abstract

(1) Mostx menx who own ay donkey beat ity. e.g. |≠M, g (1) if man = {m0, …, m9} & m0 owns & beats donkey d0, …, d9 & m1 owns & beats donkeys d10, …, d19 & m2 owns donkey d20 (only) but doesn’t beat d20..

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Donkey sentences and quantifier variability.Berit Brogaard - manuscript
Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF).Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predications and Donkey Sentences.Manfred Krifka - unknown
Donkey business.Bart Geurts - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156.
E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora.Irene Heim - 1990 - Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (2):137--77.
Descriptive pronouns and donkey anaphora.Stephen Neale - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):113-150.
Context Dependent Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora.Jeffrey C. King - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (sup1):97-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-19

Downloads
5 (#1,540,528)

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references