I

The Monist 64 (1):3-36 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. The lever in question is, of course, that with which, provided that an appropriate fulcrum could be found, Archimedes could move the world. In the analogy I have in mind, the fulcrum is the given, by virtue of which the mind gets leverage on the world of knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the epistemological foundations of the law of the lever.Maarten Van Dyck - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):315-318.
In the space of reasons: selected essays of Wilfrid Sellars.Wilfrid Sellars - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by Kevin Scharp & Robert Brandom.
Archimedes' Weapons of War and Leonardo.D. L. Simms - 1988 - British Journal for the History of Science 21 (2):195-210.
CS-UCS presentations and a lever: Human autoshaping.W. Gregg Wilcove & Joseph C. Miller - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (5):868.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
30 (#533,521)

6 months
4 (#792,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The given and the hard problem of content.Pietro Salis - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-26.
Feature-placing and proto-objects.Austen Clark - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (4):443-469.
Ambiguities in the subjective timing of experiences debate.Ronald C. Hoy - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (June):254-262.

View all 56 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references