The Background of Meaning

In John Searle, F. Kiefer & Manfred Berwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht. pp. 221-232 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a continuation of a line of investigation I began in ‘Literal Meaning’. Its aim is to explore some of the relations between the meaning of words and sentences and the context of their utterance. The view I shall be challenging is sometimes put by saying that the meaning of a sentence is the meaning that it has independently of any context whatever — the meaning it has in the so-called „null context“. The view I shall be espousing is that in general the meaning of a sentence only has application (it only, for example, determines a set of truth conditions) against a background of assumptions and practices that are not representable as a part of the meaning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What We Tend to Mean.Rani Lill Anjum & Stephen Mumford - 2011 - Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 46 (1):20-33.
Metaphor and Meaning.Alec Hyslop - 2001 - Sorites 13:23-32.
Austin on Literal Meaning.Odai Al Zoubi - 2016 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):41-64.
Speech Act Theories of Meaning.Patricia Noga Psomas - 2002 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
The Use of Expressions vs. Their Meaning. Problems and Dilemmas.Jerzy Pelc - 2007 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 26:219-246.
Background Independence, Diffeomorphism Invariance, and the Meaning of Coordinates.Oliver Pooley - 2016 - In Dennis Lehmkuhl, Gregor Schiemann & Erhard Scholz (eds.), Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. New York, NY: Birkhauser.
Meaning In Speech and In Thought.Stephen Schiffer - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):141-159.
Is Literal Meaning Conventional?Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):101-113.
Revisiting the Contribution of Literal Meaning to Legal Meaning.Brian Flanagan - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):255-271.
Can we say what we mean?: Expressibility and background.Jesús Navarro - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):283-308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-11

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John R. Searle
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Compositionality.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pragmatic Contextualism.Geoff Pynn - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (1):26-51.
Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory.Raymond W. Gibbs - 1984 - Cognitive Science 8 (3):275-304.
Context shifting arguments.Ernie Lepore & Herman Cappelen - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):25–50.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references