The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology

Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):189-197 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One common method of criticizing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is to label them as “magic bullets.” However, this criticism, like many in the debate over GMOs, is not very clear. What exactly is the “magic bullet criticism”? What are its origins? What flaw is it pointing out in GM crops and agricultural biotechnology? What is the scope of the criticism? Does it apply to all GMOs, or just some? Does it point to a fatal flaw, or something that can be fixed? The goal of this paper is to answer these questions and clarify the magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology. It is hoped that the results of this exercise will be helpful in advancing deliberationover the role GMOs and agricultural biotechnology should play in twenty-first-century agriculture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):189-197.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
How japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnology.Fumi Maekawa & Darryl Macer - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):705-716.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
5 (#1,560,281)

6 months
4 (#862,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references