Why preference-satisfaction cannot ground an egalitarian theory of justice

Journal of Social Philosophy 31 (3):294–306 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hurley on Justice and Responsibility. [REVIEW]Peter Vallentyne - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):433 - 438.
Pure time preference.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
The coherence of Rawls's plea for democratic equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
A Contradiction in the Egalitarian Theory of Justice.Michael W. Howard - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:35-55.
Rawls's A theory of justice: an introduction.Jon Mandle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Desert and equality.Richard J. Arneson - 2006 - In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Clarendon Press. pp. 262--293.
Justice as Fairness: Luck Egalitarian, Not Rawlsian.Michael Otsuka - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):217-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#502,127)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Schaller
Texas Tech University

Citations of this work

Egalitarianismul.Eugen Huzum - 2013 - In Teorii si ideologii politice. Iasi: Institutul European. pp. 49-88.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references