Unrestricted quantification and ranges of significance

Philosophical Studies 180 (5):1579-1600 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Call a quantifier ‘unrestricted’ if it ranges over absolutely all objects. Arguably, unrestricted quantification is often presupposed in philosophical inquiry. However, developing a semantic theory that vindicates unrestricted quantification proves rather difficult, at least as long as we formulate our semantic theory within a classical first-order language. It has been argued that using a type theory as framework for our semantic theory provides a resolution of this problem, at least if a broadly Fregean interpretation of type theory is assumed. However, the intelligibility of this interpretation has been questioned. In this paper I introduce a type-free theory of properties that can also be used to vindicate unrestricted quantification. This alternative emerges very naturally by reflecting on the features on which the type-theoretic solution of the problem of unrestricted quantification relies. Although this alternative theory is formulated in a non-classical logic, it preserves the deductive strength of classical strict type theory in a natural way. The ideas developed in this paper make crucial use of Russell’s notion of range of significance.

Similar books and articles

Sets, properties, and unrestricted quantification.Øystein Linnebo - 2006 - In Gabriel Uzquiano & Agustin Rayo (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--178.
Unrestricted Quantification and the Structure of Type Theory.Salvatore Florio & Nicholas K. Jones - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (1):44-64.
Unrestricted Quantification.Salvatore Florio - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (7):441-454.
Imprecise Quantification.Alexander Roberts - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (3):357-367.
The Price of Universality.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (1):137-169.
Classes, why and how.Thomas Schindler - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (2):407-435.
Context and unrestricted quantification.Michael Glanzberg - 2006 - In A. Rayo & G. Uzquiano (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press. pp. 45--74.
Meaning theory for absolutely general languages.Eric Guindon - 2019 - Logique Et Analyse 248:379-414.
Quantification and Paradox.Edward Ferrier - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
The Fragmentation of Being.Douglas I. Campbell - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):634-635.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-20

Downloads
386 (#51,491)

6 months
147 (#23,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Schindler
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Cambridge, England: Allen & Unwin.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry H. Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Truth and meaning.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):304-323.

View all 52 references / Add more references