The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud and Pseudoscience [Book Review]

The European Legacy 28 (1):117-120 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present work explores what is distinctive about science by analyzing the nature of scientific knowledge within a wider than conventional framework: broadening the focus on “physical science” to...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2023

DOI

10.1080/10848770.2022.2110367

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science and its enemies: a defence of scientific values: Lee McIntyre: The scientific attitude: defending science from denial, fraud and pseudoscience. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2019, 277 pp, $17.95 PB. [REVIEW]Felipe Núñez-Sánchez - 2022 - Metascience 31 (2):187-189.
Pseudoscience.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. SAGE.
The philosophy behind pseudoscience.Behind Pseudoscience - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus. pp. 235.
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion.Gregory W. Dawes - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):283-298.
Science and pseudoscience - Falsifiability.Nicolae Sfetcu - manuscript
Do extraordinary claims really require extraordinary evidence?Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - In K. Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-CaIIed.Daniel P. Thurs & Ronald L. Numbers - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 121.
Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.Pablo A. Pellegrini - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1297-1313.
The Social Psychology of “Pseudoscience”: A Brief History.Arthur Still & Windy Dryden - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):265-290.
The scientific attitude.Frederick Grinnell - 1987 - Boulder: Westview Press.
The Scientific Ponzi Scheme.Kevin J. S. Zollman - unknown
The “scientific miracle of the qur’ān,” pseudoscience, and conspiracism.Stefano Bigliardi - 2017 - Zygon 52 (1):146-171.
Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise, and Political Influence in Scientific Research by Robert Bell; Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing by Marcel C. LaFollette.Nicholas Steneck - 1993 - Isis 84:833-834.
Institutional Degeneration of Science.Jüri Eintalu - 2021 - Philosophy Study 11 (2):116-123.
Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference.Peter Daempfle - 2012 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-09

Downloads
25 (#629,171)

6 months
8 (#351,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references