- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Relevant deduction and hypothetico-deductivism: A reply to Gemes [Book Review]
Erkenntnis 41 (2):183 - 188 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hypothetico-deductivism, content, and the natural axiomatization of theories.Ken Gemes - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (3):477-487.
Horwich, Hempel, and hypothetico-deductivism.Ken Gemes - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
Hypothetico-Deductivism: The Current State of Play; The Criterion of Empirical Significance: Endgame.Ken Gemes - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (1):1 - 20.
Relevance logic brings hope to hypothetico-deductivism.C. Kenneth Waters - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464.
The tacking by disjunction paradox: Bayesianism versus hypothetico-deductivism.Luca Moretti - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (1):115-138.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
55 (#292,519)
6 months
11 (#246,433)
2009-01-28
Downloads
55 (#292,519)
6 months
11 (#246,433)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo