Proving the Principal Principle

In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Chance and Temporal Asymmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A closer look at the 'new' principle.Michael Strevens - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):545-561.
Chance, credence, and the principal principle.Robert Black - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):371-385.
The Typical Principle.Isaac Wilhelm - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Centering the Principal Principle.Isaac Wilhelm - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1897-1915.
On Proving Too Much.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):353-358.
Two mistakes about credence and chance.Ned Hall - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):93 – 111.
Have your cake and eat it too: The old principal principle reconciled with the new.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-17

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wolfgang Schwarz
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Interpretations of probability.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Schaffer on laws of nature.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):653-667.
Two-Dimensional De Se Chance Deference.J. Dmitri Gallow - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references