Legitime Besteuerung und konfiskatorische Expropriation

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 100 (2):263-275 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper tries to contribute to the discussion of the following problem: Nearly every government acts as if it has a natural right to collect taxes - if necessary by force. How legitimate is such an act of expropriation? To find an acceptable solution, three different theories of property are discussed - eventually favouring the Kantian approach. Subsequently, possible vindications of taxation are presented: (1) control of conduct, (2) financing public institutions, (3) reduction of social differences. All three justifications turn out to be deficient. What remains is John St. Mill’s almost forgotten theory; he sees taxes as a sacrifice and, on this account, pleads for a proportional taxation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Misled by Property.J. Penner - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18 (1).
Politics and Property in Natural Resources.Andrew P. Morriss - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):53-94.
Grundlinien eines philosophischen Systems.Christopher Jacob Boström, Reinhold Geijer & Hans Gerloff - 1924 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 4 (3):31-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
5 (#1,557,834)

6 months
4 (#855,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heinz-Gerd Schmitz
University of Cologne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references