Characterizability of Free Motion in Special Relativity

Foundations of Physics 30 (6):867-892 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of forcefree motion is primitive, i.e., unexplained, in special relativity. The paper demonstrates a way to characterize it by “more primitive,” directly operationally interpreted notions. These are the worldlines of (more or less) pointlike, but non-quantum bodies and of light signals, clock parametrizations of the former kind of worldlines and the direction, in which an observer sees a light signal go out. Already at this general level one can define the “radar distance” and the “radar (initial) velocity” of one body with respect to another, and can define in a reasonable manner that two bodies move in “opposite directions” with respect to an observer. These concepts are then used to formulate a certain criterion for path structures which can experimentally be tested without presupposing inertial frames, atomic clocks, etc. It is demonstrated that the path structure of free motion in gravity-free regions of space-time, i.e., in the domain of validity of special relativity, satisfies that criterion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rigid Body Motion in Special Relativity.Jerrold Franklin - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (12):1489-1501.
On the Foundation of the Principle of Relativity.Øyvind Grøn & Kjell Vøyenli - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (11):1695-1733.
Clock retardation, absolute space, and special relativity.Carlo Giannoni - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (5-6):427-444.
A theoretical device for space and time measurements.Edward A. Desloge - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (10):1191-1213.
The inexactness of time.G. Miller - 1973 - Foundations of Physics 3 (3):389-398.
Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic?Roger Jones - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Interaction, not gravitation.Richard Schlegel - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (4):435-438.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Spatial Directions, Anisotropy and Special Relativity.Marco Mamone Capria - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (8):1375-1397.
Conventionalism in special relativity.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):573-583.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
63 (#262,459)

6 months
2 (#1,257,544)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Computational Learning Semantics for Inductive Empirical Knowledge.Kevin T. Kelly - 2014 - In Alexandru Baltag & Sonja Smets (eds.), Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics. Springer International Publishing. pp. 289-337.
Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics.Alexandru Baltag & Sonja Smets (eds.) - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Meaning of Relativity.Albert Einstein - 1922 - London,: Routledge. Edited by Edwin P. Adams.
Relativity: the general theory.John Lighton Synge (ed.) - 1960 - New York,: Interscience Publishers.

Add more references