Taurek on numbers don't count

In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why the numbers should sometimes count.John T. Sanders - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14.
Taurek, numbers and probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Aggregation and two moral methods.F. M. Kamm - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (1):1-23.
The distribution of numbers and the comprehensiveness of reasons.Veronique Munoz-Darde - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):207–233.
Saving the Few.Tyler Doggett - 2011 - Noûs 47 (2):302-315.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.
What Is Wrong With Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek.Tyler Doggett - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-16.
The numbers should count.Gregory S. Kavka - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (3):285 - 294.
Why the numbers count.James F. Woodward - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):531-540.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-25

Downloads
33 (#486,838)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Saunders
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references