Public appraisal of government efforts and participation intent in medico-ethical policymaking in Japan: a large scale national survey concerning brain death and organ transplant [Book Review]

, &
BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-12 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Public satisfaction with policy process influences the legitimacy and acceptance of policies, and conditions the future political process, especially when contending ethical value judgments are involved. On the other hand, public involvement is required if effective policy is to be developed and accepted

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1186/1472-6939-6-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

YUTPA as a design tool for public participation.Maurice Berix - 2012 - AI and Society 27 (1):165-172.
Arguments against promoting organ transplants from brain-dead donors, and views of contemporary japanese on life and death.Atsushi Asai, Yasuhiro Kadooka & Kuniko Aizawa - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):215-223.
The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: contributing to public policy.Elisa Eiseman - 2003 - Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Beyond serving a purpose: additional ethical focuses for public policy agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Philosophers and the public policy process: Inside, outside, or nowhere at all?Richard W. Momeyer - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (4):391-409.
The ohio study in light of national data and clinical experience.Tracy C. Schmidt - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):235-240.
Large scale surveys for policy formation and research–a study in inconsistency.Søren Holm & Lisa Bortolotti - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):205-220.
Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy.Mike Nair-Collins - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):667-683.
Death and organ procurement: Public beliefs and attitudes.Laura A. Siminoff, Christopher Burant & Stuart J. Youngner - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):217-234.
Public Consultation in Bioethics. What's the Point of Asking the Public When They Have Neither Scientific nor Ethical Expertise?Mairi Levitt - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):15-25.
Reconsidering the dead donor rule: Is it important that organ donors be dead?Norman Fost - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):249-260.
The future of public policy.Hugh Compston - 2008 - World Futures 64 (1):43 – 59.
Subjective Well-Being and Policy.Bruno S. Frey & Jana Gallus - 2013 - Topoi 32 (2):207-212.
Policy design for human embryo research in canada: An analysis (part 2 of 2). [REVIEW]Françoise Baylis & Matthew Herder - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):351-365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-17

Downloads
105 (#167,951)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Who Is Buying Normative Bioethics Research?Alexander C. Tsai - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):62-63.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.Bernard Manin - 1987 - Political Theory 15 (3):338-368.
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.Lynn J. Frewer & Gene Rowe - 2000 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (1):3-29.
Japan's Dilemma with the Definition of Death.Rihito Kimura - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (2):123-131.

View all 7 references / Add more references