Electronic fetal monitoring in the twenty-first century: Language, logic and Lewis Carroll

Clinical Ethics 16 (3):213-221 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Alice Books, full of illogical thoughts, words, and contradictions, were unrivaled entertainment until the publication of the medical literature promoting electronic fetal monitoring for every pregnancy. The modern-day EFM advocates acknowledge EFM’s decades long failure but simultaneously recommend EFM use for lawsuit protection and because the profession has used EFM for every pregnancy for fifty years, therefore, it must be efficacious. These self-indulgent, illogical rationalizations ignore the half century of evidence-based scientific research proving that EFM is a complete failure as well as ignoring the fact that continued EFM use violates the fundamental principles of modern bioethics. This blind advocacy perpetuates four pernicious EFM harms occurring to mothers, babies, and the medical profession itself. This article sets out these four EFM harms with the goal of abolishing the misguided, illogical, contradictory, arguments used by the twenty-first century EFM Lewis Carroll mimics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lewis Carroll's visual logic.Francine F. Abeles - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):1-17.
Autonomy in Maternal Accounts of Birth after Cesarean.Tanya N. Cook - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):62-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-07

Downloads
20 (#765,631)

6 months
8 (#356,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?