The Subformula Property In Classical Natural Deduction Established Constructively

Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):710-719 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A constructive proof is provided for the claim that classical first-order logic admits of a natural deduction formulation featuring the subformula property.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sequent calculus in natural deduction style.Sara Negri & Jan von Plato - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1803-1816.
Labelled non-classical logics.Luca Viganò€ - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Intuitionistic Logic Freed of All Metarules.Giovanna Corsi & Gabriele Tassi - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1204 - 1218.
Harmonising Natural Deduction.Hartley Slater - 2008 - Synthese 163 (2):187 - 198.
Varieties of linear calculi.Sara Negri - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):569-590.
Subformula semantics for strong negation systems.Seiki Akama - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):217 - 226.
A Brief History of Natural Deduction.Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (1):1-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
27 (#594,564)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tor Sandqvist
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Citations of this work

Necessity of Thought.Cesare Cozzo - 2015 - In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Springer. pp. 101-20.
Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning.Heinrich Wansing (ed.) - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Add more citations