Is the Replacement Thesis Defensible?

동서철학연구(Dong Seo Cheol Hak Yeon Gu; Studies in Philosophy East-West) 45:181-200 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Group minds as extended minds.Keith Raymond Harris - 2020 - Philosophical Explorations 23 (3):1-17.
C. Stephen Layman’s Moral Argument.Bahram Alizadeh - 2021 - Philosophical Investigations 15 (34):248-266.
Quantification, Mandated Science and Judgment.Ed Levy - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):723-737.
Makers' rights.A. John Simmons - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218.
Does Philosophy Matter?—It Would Appear So. A Reply to Fish.Paul Boghossian - 2011 - Essay From the Stone Series in the New York Times.
Replacement—A Sheffer Stroke for Belief Change.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):127-149.
Why Computer Simulation Cannot Be an End of Thought Experimentation.N. K. Shinod - 2021 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (3):431-453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-16

Downloads
7 (#1,392,075)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references