Begging the question as involving actual belief and inconceivable without it

Metaphilosophy 19 (1):32–37 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article answers John Biro's "Knowability, Believability, and Begging the Question: a Reply to Sanford" in "Metaphilosophy" 15 (1984). Biro and I agree that of two argument instances with the same form and content, one but not the other can beg the question, depending on other factors. These factors include actual beliefs, or so I maintain (against Biro) with the help of some analysed examples. Brief selections from Archbishop Whatley and J S Mill suggest that they also regard reference to actual beliefs as essential to explaining begging the question.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Begging the Question.David H. Sanford - 1972 - Analysis 32 (6):197-199.
Begging the question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
Petitio principii: What's wrong?Andrea Iacona & Diego Marconi - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34.
Rescuing ?Begging the question?J. I. Biro - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (4):257-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#548,845)

6 months
9 (#354,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Sanford
Duke University

Citations of this work

Begging the question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations