Why 'Law and Economics' Is Not the Frankenstein Monster

Economics and Philosophy 15 (2):249 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a published debate between Law and Economics avatar Judge Richard Posner and Professor Robin Malloy entitled ‘Is Law and Economics Moral?’, Malloy argued that the dominant methodology of Law and Economics is immoral. Malloy likened it to the Frankenstein Monster – an unholy, undead abomination that can go berserk despite its ostensibly benign provenience. Malloy claimed that wealth maximization applied to social discourse ‘reduces people to an human existence to imaginary variables for calculation’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
32 (#504,058)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1994 - Princeton University Press.
The value of life for decision making in the public sector.Dan Usher - 1985 - In Ellen Frankel Paul, Jeffrey Paul & Fred Dycus Miller (eds.), Ethics and economics. New York, N.Y.: [Published by] B. Blackwell for the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University.

Add more references