Quasars, Causality, and Geometry

In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 254 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shows how the failure of astrophysicists to honor the distinction between causal processes and pseudoprocesses vitiates much of the discussion of quasars since their discovery in 1963. In this case, the theory of causality presented in this book bears directly on recent developments in an exciting branch of physical science. An appendix to the chapter presents numerous examples of the application of the fallacious argument connecting variation in brightness of an astronomical object with its compactness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on the geometry of visibles.Gordon Belot - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.
Causal Theories of Time.J. J. C. Smart - 1969 - The Monist 53 (3):385-395.
Causality without counterfactuals.Wesley C. Salmon - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):297-312.
Ternary operations as primitive notions for plane geometry II.Victor Pambuccian - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):345-348.
Causality and explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reconsidering relativistic causality.Jeremy Butterfield - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):295 – 328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
25 (#638,434)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references