The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):600-610 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Decisions to provide life-sustaining medical care for marginally viable newborns present a unique set of morally complex challenges for providers and parents in the United States. This article examines recent legal trends that restrict discretionary decision-making, and critiques commonly employed ethical justifications offered to support permitting such discretion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How parapsychology could become a science.Paul M. Churchland - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):227 – 239.
Critical legal studies.James Boyle (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
The rationality of reasonableness.Alan Gewirth - 1983 - Synthese 57 (2):225 - 247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
19 (#805,446)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A New Rejection of Moral Expertise.Christopher Cowley - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (3):273-279.
Medical paternalism.Allen Buchanan - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (4):370-390.
Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):34-42.
Reasoning in bioethics.Grant Gillett - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (3):243–260.

Add more references