The ‘School of Structural Analysis’ in Modern Russian Sinology

Journal of World Philosophies 1 (1):26-40 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The second half of the twentieth century was marked by the appearance of a new and original school in Russian sinology which uses the so-called methodology of ‘structural analysis’ in studying Chinese classics and attempts to find an authentic methodology among Chinese philosophers themselves. Its most influential representatives are V.S. Spirin, A. M. Karapetyants, A. I. Kobzev and A. A. Krushinsky. The main thesis of Russian ‘structuralists’ is that the composition of the ancient Chinese text influences its content directly. A composition of a text is derived from a configuration of its parallel passages. The method of ‘structural analysis’, therefore, aims to detect and describe these parallelisms, and then makes some interpretation of them. The present paper gives a short introduction to the history of this school, its main representatives and concepts, and also shows how the method of ‘structural analysis’ works on some concrete examples.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Approach to Several Issues on Russian Sinology.Guo-Dong Yan - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:74-81.
Axis view from overseas Sinology Sinology.Chang Hirata - 2007 - Chinese Literature and Philosophy of Communication 17 (4):99-104.
Inhaltsanalyse und strukturale Textanalyse.Werner Früh - 1981 - Analyse & Kritik 3 (1):93-116.
Man as Creation and Creator of Culture.Karen A. Svas'ian - 1988 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 27 (2):29-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-02

Downloads
9 (#1,275,915)

6 months
3 (#1,036,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?