Responsibility and capacities: A note on the proportionality assumption

Analysis 74 (3):393-397 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That responsible moral agency presupposes certain mental capacities, constitutes a widely accepted view among theorists. Moreover, it is often assumed that degrees in the development of the relevant capacities co-vary with degrees of responsibility. In this article it is argued that, the move from the view that responsibility requires certain mental capacities to the position that degrees of responsibility co-vary with degrees of the development of the mental capacities, is premature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
63 (#256,981)

6 months
8 (#364,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Being More Blameworthy.D. Justin Coates - 2019 - American Philosophical Quarterly 56 (3):233-246.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.
A plea for monsters.Philippe Schlenker - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (1):29-120.
Monsters in Kaplan’s logic of demonstratives.Brian Rabern - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):393-404.
Open quotation.François Recanati - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):637-687.
Enhancing Responsibility.Nicole Vincent - 2013 - In Nicole A. Vincent (ed.), Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Oup Usa. pp. 305-333.

View all 12 references / Add more references