Cosmic Topology, Underdetermination, and Spatial Infinity

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14 (17):1-28 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is well-known that the global structure of every space-time model for relativistic cosmology is observationally underdetermined. In order to alleviate the severity of this underdetermination, it has been proposed that we adopt the Cosmological Principle because the Principle restricts our attention to a distinguished class of space-time models (spatially homogeneous and isotropic models). I argue that, even assuming the Cosmological Principle, the topology of space remains observationally underdetermined. Nonetheless, I argue that we can muster reasons to prefer various topological properties over others. In particular, I favor the adoption of multiply connected universe models on grounds of (i) simplicity, (ii) Machian considerations, and (iii) explanatory power. We are able to appeal to such grounds because multiply connected topologies open up the possibility of finite universe models (consistent with our best data), which in turn avoid thorny issues concerning the postulation of an actually infinite universe.

Similar books and articles

Electrodynamics at spatial infinity.Matthew Alexander & Peter G. Bergmann - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (10):925-951.
Topology Change and the Unity of Space.Craig Callender & Robert Weingard - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (2):227-246.
Is There a Spatial Analogue of the Passage of Time?Peter J. Riggs - 2017 - Philosophy and Cosmology 18:12-21.
Is There a Spatial Analogue of the Passage of Time?Peter J. Riggs - 2017 - Philosophy and Cosmology 18:12-21.
Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology?Claus Beisbart - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):175-205.
Is There a Spatial Analogue of the Passage of Time?Peter J. Riggs - 2017 - Filosofiâ I Kosmologiâ 18 (1):12-21.
Reckoning the shape of everything: Underdetermination and cosmotopology.P. D. Magnus - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):541-557.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-16

Downloads
70 (#232,012)

6 months
70 (#68,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick J. Ryan
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual.Elliott Sober - 2015 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quantum Gravity.Carlo Rovelli - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Quantitative parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.
The Meaning of Relativity.Albert Einstein - 1922 - London,: Routledge. Edited by Edwin P. Adams.
Philosophy of Cosmology.Chris Smeenk - 2013 - In Robert Batterman (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 607-652.

View all 32 references / Add more references