Taking umpiring seriously: How philosophy can help umpires make the right calls

In Eric Bronson (ed.), Baseball and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 87--103 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy of Umpiring and the Introduction of Decision-Aid Technology.Harry Collins - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):135-146.
Officiating in Aesthetic Sports.Graham McFee - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):1-17.
Natural advantages and contractual justice.Larry Alexander & William Wang - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (2):281 - 297.
Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on inference.Ulf Hlobil - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):419-429.
Does Christianity Make a Difference?R. A. McCormick - 1995 - Christian Bioethics 1 (1):97-101.
Taking Self‐Excitations Seriously: On Angel's Initial Condition.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):319-326.
Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse.Mitchell S. Green - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1):83 - 112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
37 (#442,069)

6 months
8 (#409,776)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Jim Joyce Wasn’t Wrong: Baseball and the Euthyphro Dilemma.Amber L. Griffioen - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42 (3):327-348.
The Moral Ambiguity of the Makeup Call.Mark Hamilton - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (2):212-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references