- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates
Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.)
New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2013)
Abstract
This collection provides a selection of the most essential contributions to the contemporary free will debate. Among the issues discussed and debated are skepticism and naturalism, alternate possibilities, the consequence argument, libertarian metaphysics, illusionism and revisionism, optimism and pessimism, neuroscience and free will, and experimental philosophyAuthor Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
Similar books and articles
Debates in Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses.Stewart Duncan & Antonia LoLordo (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
Optimistic skepticism about free will.Derk Pereboom - 2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. Oup Usa. pp. 421.
Readings on the Ultimate Questions, Third Edition.Nils Ch Rauhut & Robert Bass (eds.) - 2010 - Prentice-Hall.
Introduction: The contours of contemporary free will debates.Robert H. Kane - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Free WIll.Kevin Timpe - 2012 - In Neil Manson & Bob Barnard (eds.), Continuum Companion to Metaphysics. London: Continuum. pp. 223-243.
Social and political philosophy: classic and contemporary readings.Andrea Veltman (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The contours of contemporary free will debates.Robert H. Kane - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Libertarianism and skepticism about free will: Some arguments against both.Manuel Vargas - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1&2):403-26.
Scientific Skepticism about Free Will.Alfred Mele - 2010 - In Thomas Nadelhoffer, Eddy Nahmias & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 295.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Naturalism.Jason Turner - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):565-587.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-27
Downloads
636 (#26,815)
6 months
264 (#8,938)
2011-01-27
Downloads
636 (#26,815)
6 months
264 (#8,938)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
"Actual" does not imply "feasible".Nicholas Southwood & David Wiens - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):3037-3060.
Willusionism, epiphenomenalism, and the feeling of conscious will.Sven Walter - 2014 - Synthese 191 (10):2215-2238.
Free Will and Moral Sense: Strawsonian Approaches.Paul Russell - 2017 - In Routledge Companion to Free Will. London, UK: pp. 96-108.
“Free Will and Affirmation: Assessing Honderich’s Third Way”.Paul Russell - 2017 - In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), Ted Honderich on Consciousness, Determinism, and Humanity. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. Pp. 159-79..
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-bzrbm uwo