Review of Michael Ruse: Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):515-521 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/49.3.515

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Essay Review: Progress and Its Problems. [REVIEW]Joe Cain - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):197-204.
Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology by Michael Ruse. [REVIEW]Thomas Junker - 1998 - Isis 89:149-150.
Review of Michael Ruse: Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. [REVIEW]Ron Amundson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):515-521.
Monad to Man. [REVIEW]Christopher D. Horvath - 2001 - International Studies in Philosophy 33 (4):140-142.
Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Michael Ruse.Thomas Junker - 1998 - Isis 89 (1):149-150.
Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress.J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.
Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
The notion of progress in evolutionary biology – the unresolved problem and an empirical suggestion.Bernd Rosslenbroich - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):41-70.
Evolutionary novelty and the Evo-devo synthesis: field notes.I. Brigandt & Alan C. Love - 2010 - Evolutionary Biology 37:93–99.
Levels, Time and Fitness in Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.Pierrick Bourrat - 2015 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 7 (20150505).
Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: The radiation of a concept.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 299:9-17.
Is Evolutionary Epistemology of Science Compatible with Scientific Realism.Ivan Kuzin - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 46 (4):163-179.
Is it a revolution?Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):429-437.
The strategy concept and John Maynard Smith’s influence on theoretical biology.Manfred D. Laubichler, Edward H. Hagen & Peter Hammerstein - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (5):1041-1050.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
44 (#362,335)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection--A Philosophical Analysis.Samir Okasha - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):319-351.
The biological sciences can act as a ground for ethics.Michael Ruse - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 297–315.
Revisiting the eclipse of Darwinism.Peter J. Bowler - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (1):19-32.
Again, what the philosophy of biology is not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references