Reply

Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):288-308 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Author’s reply to four commentaries on ‘Legal Subjects and Juridical Persons: Developing Public Legal Theory through Fuller and Arendt.’

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5553/njlp/.000024

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kristen Rundle: Legal Subjects and Juridical Persons: Developing Public Legal Theory through Fuller and Arendt.Morag Goodwin, Michiel Besters & Rudolf Rjgersberg - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):209-211.
Legal Subjects and Juridical Persons: Developing Public Legal Theory through Fuller and Arendt.Kristen Rundle - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):212-239.
The Experience of Legal Injustice.Wouter Veraart - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):267-278.
Forms liberate: reclaiming the jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller.Kristen Rundle - 2012 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
The Contents of Consciousness: Reply to Hellie, Peacocke and Siegel.David J. Chalmers - 2013 - Analysis 73 (2):345-368.
In reply [reply to commentaries on "how to solve the mind-body problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.
Author Reply: Reply to Commentaries on Language and Emotion.George Lakoff - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (3):284-285.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.
Lawyers Doing Philosophy.Pauline Westerman - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):260-266.
Reply to Tuomela’s Reply to My Reply.John Wettersten - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):124-125.
Williamson on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic and the Knowledge Norm for Rational Belief: A Reply to a Reply to a Reply.Stewart Cohen & Juan Comesaña - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (4):400-415.
Beyond Recovery? A Reply to Tennant.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (3):387-392.
St. Anselm's Proslogion, with A Reply on Behalf of the Fool and The Author's Reply to Gaunilo.J. Charlesworth - 1967 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 22 (1):82-83.
Reply to Pardo: Unsafe Legal Knowledge?Mark McBride - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (1):67-73.
Libertarianism Behind the Caricature: Reply to a Befuddled Author.J. C. Lester - 2016 - In Arguments for Liberty: A Libertarian Miscellany. Buckingham, England: The University of Buckingham Press. pp. 72-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-28

Downloads
39 (#412,276)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Experience of Legal Injustice.Wouter Veraart - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (3):267-278.

Add more references