The forum." Well, what we got here is a failure to communicate": revisiting and reviewing the reviewers of research

Ethics and Behavior 12 (4):371 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.Boris Kotchoubey, Sarah Bütof & Ranganatha Sitaram - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):829-835.
The problem of humiliation in peer review.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2014 - Ethics and Education 9 (2):141-156.
Peer reviewers can meet journals’ criteria for authorship.Thomas Erren, Michael Erren & David Shaw - 2013 - British Medical Journal 346:f166.
Ethics of field research: Do journals set the standard?Helene Marsh & Carole M. Eros - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):375-382.
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian H. Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
Futility: revisiting a concept of shared moral judgment.David A. Fleming - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (4):260-275.
Self, narrative and self-constitution: Revisiting Taylor's “self-interpreting animals”.Kenneth Baynes - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (4):441-457.
Ought Research to be Unrestricted?Michael Dummett - 1981 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 12 (1):281-298.
Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey.Marion Broome, Molly C. Dougherty, Margaret C. Freda, Margaret H. Kearney & Judith G. Baggs - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (6):741-748.
Research in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis.David A. Shapiro - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (2):91-92.
Professional Ethics Considerations of Research Ethics Board Members in Canada.Maureen Muldoon - 2006 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 25 (1-4):67-80.
Bias in Peer Review of Organic Farming Grant Applications.Jesper Rasmussen, Vibeke Langer & Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe - 2006 - Agriculture and Human Values 23 (2):181-188.
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-24

Downloads
8 (#1,324,543)

6 months
4 (#799,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references