The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):147-168 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Making decisions with an, often significant, element of risk seems to be an integral part of many of the projects of the diverse profession of engineering. Whether it be decisions about the design of products, manufacturing processes, public works, or developing technological solutions to environmental, social and global problems, risk taking seems inherent to the profession. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the topic and specifically to how our understanding of engineering as a distinctive profession might affect how we should make decisions under risk. This paper seeks to remedy this, firstly by offering a nuanced account of risk and then by considering how specific claims about our understanding of engineering as a social profession, with corresponding social values and obligations, should inform how we make decisions about risk in this context

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-20

Downloads
1,147 (#11,052)

6 months
101 (#44,172)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Allison Ross
University of Leeds (PhD)

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
Moral Luck.B. A. O. Williams & T. Nagel - 1976 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:115 - 151.

View all 16 references / Add more references