Reflective Evaluation, Autonomy, and Self-Knowledge

Dissertation, Stanford University (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Harry Frankfurt has argued that acting autonomously requires the reflective endorsement of the motives which move one to action. I agree with Frankfurt's thesis as a starting point; but I believe that a richer, more textured account is needed. Several deficiencies in Frankfurt's account have been noted by critics, and there are many who challenge Frankfurt's endorsement thesis. In addition, I identify two problems with Frankfurt's account which have heretofore gone unnoticed and which, in my view, necessitate revision. ;One problem is that reflective evaluation is not required to penetrate to the agent's ends in wanting to act. In Frankfurt's own examples, reflective evaluation focuses on the action promoted by the agent's motives, and does not get to the agent's ends. I submit, however, that action and end can come apart with respect to endorsement, and that reflective evaluation which penetrates only to the action promoted by the agent's motives cannot secure autonomy. The scope of the reflective evaluation requirement must be extended to cover the agent's ends in wanting to act. Second, there are no restrictions on the basis upon which reflective evaluations may be formed. Frankfurt appeals to reflective endorsements as representative of core attitudes, but sets nothing in place to ensure this representation. To the contrary, he insists that there need be no restrictions on the formation of endorsements, that they may be formed capriciously and irresponsibly, on any or no basis. But there is no reason to think that endorsements so formed will bear any connection to core attitudes. I argue that a grounding for endorsements must be found which ensures that essential attitudes are reflected, while at the same time allowing for uniqueness in what those attitudes may be. ;I propose an account which builds on Frankfurt's insight and is responsive to these difficulties. Specifically, I propose a care-based, extended reflective endorsement account. On this account, acting autonomously requires the reflective endorsement of motives, extending both to the ends and actions promoted, grounded in what the agent cares about

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Endorsement and Autonomous Agency.François Schroeter - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):633-659.
Autonomy and hierarchy.Michael E. Bratman - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):156-176.
Autonomy and Recognition: A Social and Affective Account of Personal Autonomy.Sherri Heather Nass - 2003 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Agency, autonomy, and social intelligibility.William Hasselberger - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):255-278.
Intuitive and reflective beliefs.Dan Sperber - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (1):67-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references