- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Armstrong on classes as states of affairs
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):613 – 625 (1995)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Does Armstrong need states of affairs?James D. Rissler - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):193 – 209.
Nomic universals and particular causal relations: Which are basic and which are derived?John Bolender - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):405-410.
Natural classes of universals: Why Armstrong's analysis fails.Lowell Friesen - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
79 (#212,206)
6 months
2 (#1,206,802)
2009-01-28
Downloads
79 (#212,206)
6 months
2 (#1,206,802)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Propositions and Parthood: The Universe and Anti-Symmetry.Chris Tillman & Gregory Fowler - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):525 - 539.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo