Against intentionalism: an experimental study on demonstrative reference

Linguistics and Philosophy 45 (5):1027-1061 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we present two experimental studies on reference of complex demonstratives. The results of our experiments challenge the dominant view in philosophy of language, according to which demonstrative reference is determined by the speaker's intentions. The first experiment shows that in a context where there are two candidates for the referent—one determined by the speaker’s intention, the other by some “external” factors—people prefer to identify the referent of a demonstrative with the latter object. The external factors for which this prediction has been confirmed include the speaker’s demonstration and the descriptive content of a demonstrative. The second experiment shows that while this preference can be explained in terms of the speakers’ having different sorts of referential intentions, the relevant kind of intentions are fully opaque to the subjects. At the end of our paper, we point to some alternative accounts of demonstrative reference, including a pluralistic and hybrid approach, which can accommodate our experimental results.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three views of demonstrative reference.Marga Reimer - 1992 - Synthese 93 (3):373 - 402.
Perception and Demonstrative Reference.Susanna Claire Siegel - 2000 - Dissertation, Cornell University
A Defence of Intentionalism about Demonstratives.Alex Radulescu - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 775-791.
Self, Reference and Self-Reference.E. J. Lowe - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (263):15-33.
Studies Toward a Theory of Indexical Reference.William Walter Taschek - 1983 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
A Kantian Interpretation of Demonstrative Reference.Wing-Chun Wong - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:199-204.
Experimental philosophy and the theory of reference.Max Deutsch - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):445-466.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-09

Downloads
46 (#345,620)

6 months
14 (#179,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Parasitic intentions. A case against intentionalism.Wojciech Rostworowski - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.
Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference.Saul Kripke - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):255-276.
Designation.Michael Devitt - 1981 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (3):339.

View all 44 references / Add more references