Methodological Issues in the Construction of Gender as a Meaningful Variable in Scientific Studies of Cognition

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:109 - 119 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Specific methodological limitations of traditional sex differences research are uncovered by feminist psychologists who argue for a shift toward a theoretical appropriation of gender that reveals its significance as a site of ongoing situated social regulation. I argue that such a shift has important implications for studies on gender and cognition, and that such studies have the potential to significantly expand our understanding of the contextual and situated nature of both social and "non-social" cognition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. pp. 67--83.
Sex, gender, and science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
29 (#546,764)

6 months
6 (#509,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phyllis Rooney
Oakland University

Citations of this work

Intra-feminist Critique: Modes of Disengagement.Marilyn Frye - 2001 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy (2):85-87.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references