Listeners' adaptation to unreliable intonation is speaker-sensitive

&
Cognition 204 (C):104372 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104372

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Evidential Strength of Intonational Cues and Rational Adaptation to Reliable Intonation.Timo B. Roettger & Michael Franke - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (7):e12745.
Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.Jia E. Loy, Hannah Rohde & Martin Corley - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S6):1434-1456.
Listeners' perceptual mapping of locus equations and variability.Krishna Govindarajan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):266-267.
From Holophrase to Syntax: Intonation and the Victory of Voice over Gesture.Teresa Bejarano - 2014 - Humana Mente 7 (27).
This and That: A Theory of Reference for Names, Demonstratives, and Things in Between.Eliot Michaelson - 2013 - Dissertation, Ucla
The Problem with Subject‐Sensitive Invariantism.Keith Derose - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):346-350.
Rich pitch: The humorous effects of deaccent and L+H* pitch accent.Ann Wennerstrom - 2011 - Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (2):310-332.
Knowledge and Implicature: Modeling Language Understanding as Social Cognition.Noah D. Goodman & Andreas Stuhlmüller - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):173-184.
Keeping an eye on gestures: Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication.Marianne Gullberg & Kenneth Holmqvist - 1999 - Pragmatics and Cognition 7 (1):35-63.
Language from gesture.Sherman Wilcox - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):525-526.
The problem with subject-sensitive invariantism.Keith Derose - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):346–350.
Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.Chigusa Kurumada, Meredith Brown, Sarah Bibyk, Daniel F. Pontillo & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2014 - Cognition 133 (2):335-342.
Listeners use speaker identity to access representations of spatial perspective during online language comprehension.Rachel A. Ryskin, Ranxiao Frances Wang & Sarah Brown-Schmidt - 2016 - Cognition 147 (C):75-84.
Tonal range and volume level preferences of broadcast listeners.P. Eisenberg & H. A. Chinn - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (5):374.
Perceptual Learning of Intonation Contour Categories in Adults and 9‐ to 11‐Year‐Old Children: Adults Are More Narrow‐Minded.Vsevolod Kapatsinski, Paul Olejarczuk & Melissa A. Redford - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (2):383-415.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-30

Downloads
18 (#854,063)

6 months
10 (#305,705)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 15 references / Add more references