In Search of a New Looking Glass: Cognitive Science Is Not Dead, It Is Just Asleep

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):419-420 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Exploring the Depth of Dream Experience: The Enactive Framework and Methods for Neurophenomenological Research” by Elizaveta Solomonova & Xin Wei Sha. Upshot: Solomonova and Sha draw inspiration from the work programme that sparked the enactive extension to cognitive science, and propose a framework for dream scientists. This case study for a renewed cognitive science highlights key points that are worth developing, in light of current practices in neuroscience.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dreams: An Experimental Laboratory of Phenomenology.U. Kordeš - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):423-425.
We Need to Go Deeper! Conceptual and Methodological Considerations on the Depth of Dream Experience.J. M. Windt - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):429-432.
Enactive Consciousness and Gendlin’s Dream Analysis.R. D. Ellis - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):425-427.
Dreaming: Ontological and Methodological Considerations.M. D. Kirchhoff - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):420-423.
Neurophenomenology’s Epistemological Locus and the Need to Consider Its Primitive Sources: Internal Processing and Development.A. Rosales-Lagarde - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):427-429.
Blurring the Differences between the Dream, Perceptual and Hallucinatory Experiences Is Not the Answer.J. C. González - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):417-419.
Exploring the Depth of Dream Experience: The Enactive Framework and Methods for Neurophenomenological Research.E. Solomonova & X. W. Sha - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):407-416.
Enactive Cognitive Science. Part 2: Methods, Insights, and Potential.K. McGee - 2006 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (2):73-82.
Cognitive Anthropology Is a Cognitive Science.James S. Boster - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):372-378.
In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience. [REVIEW]Steve Torrance - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):357-368.
Commentary on Mata and von Helversen: Foraging Theory as a Paradigm Shift for Cognitive Aging.Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (3):535-542.
Enactive Cognitive Science. Part 1: History and Research Themes.K. McGee - 2005 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (1):19--34.
Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science.Rick Dale, Eric Dietrich & Anthony Chemero - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):739-742.
Steps to a "Properly Embodied" Cognitive Science.Mog Stapleton - 2013 - Cognitive Systems Research 22 (June):1-11.
Constructing a Philosophy of Science of Cognitive Science.William Bechtel - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (3):548-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
9 (#1,257,023)

6 months
1 (#1,475,652)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Etienne Roesch
University of Reading

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references