Leibniz's Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in his Correspondence with Clarke

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (4):429 – 438 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Section 21 of his fifth letter to Clarke Leibniz attempts to derive the Identity of Indiscernibles from an application of the Principle of Sufficient Reason to God´s act of creation, namely that God has a reason to create the world he creates. In this paper I argue that this argument fails, not just because the Identity of Indiscernibles is false, but because there is a counterexample to one of the premises that Leibniz cannot satisfactorily rule out.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00048409912349201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brute facts, the necessity of identity, and the identity of indiscernibles.Charles B. Cross - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):1-10.
What is Leibniz's argument for the identity of indiscernibles in his correspondence with Clarke?Francesco Martinello - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):315 – 333.
What is the ground for the principle of the identity of indiscernibles in Leibniz's correspondence with Clarke?Thomas C. Vinci - 1974 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (1):95-101.
The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence: together with extracts from Newton's Principia and Opticks.Samuel Clarke - 1956 - New York: Barnes & Noble. Edited by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Isaac Newton & H. G. Alexander.
The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Samuel Clarke - 1956 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
The Epistemological Roots of the Dispute over Time and Freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.Michael Wenisch - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):201-220.
Exclusion principle and the identity of indiscernibles: A response to Margenau's argument.Michela Massimi - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):303--30.
Two spheres, twenty spheres, and the identity of indiscernibles.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.
How not to trivialise the identity of indiscernibles.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2006 - In P. F. Strawson & A. Chakrabarti (eds.), Concepts, Properties and Qualities. Ashgate.
Leibniz's argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in Primary Truths.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2004 - In M. Carrara, A. M. Nunziante & G. Tomasi (eds.), Individuals, minds and bodies: themes from Leibniz. Franz Steiner Verlag.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#126,677)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Do identity and distinctness facts threaten the PSR?Erica Shumener - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (4):1023-1041.
Leibniz and Newton on Space.Ori Belkind - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.Brandon C. Look - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The identity of indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.
Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles.Steven French & Michael Redhead - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):233-246.
Leibniz's philosophy of logic and language.Hide Ishiguro - 1972 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leibniz's Philosophy of Logic and Language.Hideko Ishiguro - 1974 - Philosophy East and West 24 (3):376-378.

View all 12 references / Add more references