The Vulgar Conception of Objects in "Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses"

Hume Studies 33 (1):67-90 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we see that contrary to most readings of T 1.4.2 in the Treatise ("Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses"), Hume does not think that objects are sense impressions. This means that Hume's position on objects (whatever that may be) is not to be conflated with the vulgar perspective. Moreover, the vulgar perspective undergoes a marked transition in T 1.4.2, evolving from what we may call vulgar perspective I into vulgar perspective II. This paper presents the first detailed analysis of this evolution, which includes an explanation of T 1.4.2's four-part system.

Similar books and articles

Hume and the External World.Stefanie Rocknak - 2019 - In Alex Sager & Angela Coventry (eds.), _The Humean Mind_. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. pp. 124-136.
Vulgar Habits and Hume's Double Vision Argument.Annemarie Butler - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):169-187.
Notes on Hume and Skepticism of the Senses.Bryson Brown - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):289-303.
Reading Hume's Inference from Constancy from the Vulgar Standpoint.Kien-How Goh - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):237-253.
Humean Bodies.Ruth Weintraub - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (4):373.
The Problem of Justice in Plato’s Republic.Erjus Mezini - 2016 - Philosophical Inquiry 40 (3-4):178-191.
The Objects of the Vulgar.N. G. E. Harris - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):257-264.
The Objects of the Vulgar.N. G. E. Harris - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-03

Downloads
1,400 (#8,120)

6 months
174 (#18,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stefanie Rocknak
Hartwick College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references