Thinking And Machines

Philosophy 33 (126):356-356 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Professors A. D. Ritchie and F. H. George both miss the question: What is the use of saying that machines think? Does the extension in the use of the word “think” to cover the complicated activity of modern machines enable us to explain better the nature of such activity? Extensions in usage are common and necessary in science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On thinking machines and feeling machines.Roland Puccetti - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (May):39-51.
Machines as Persons?Oswald Hanfling - 1991 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 29:25-34.
Thinking and Machines.A. D. Ritchie & W. Mays - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):258 - 261.
Can machines think?W. Mays - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (April):148-62.
Of thinking machines and the centred self.A. Raghuramaraju - 1995 - AI and Society 9 (2-3):184-192.
Self-Recognition and Countermemory.Eric Steinhart - 1989 - Philosophy Today 33 (4):302-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
14 (#1,018,297)

6 months
3 (#1,045,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references