Stimulus size and visual angle in a cue-reduced experimental setting

, &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1):29-30 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03329945

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Absolute threshold for visual slant: The effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):170.
Effect of size on visual slant.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):96.
Is no-stimulus a stimulus?Robert Fried, Livingston Welch & Miriam Friedman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):145.
Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus.John C. Hay & Herbert L. Pick Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):150.
The relationship between visual illusion and aesthetic preference – an attempt to unify experimental phenomenology and empirical aesthetics.Kaoru Noguchi - 2003 - Axiomathes 13 (3-4):261-281.
Importance of object recognition in size constancy.Robert C. Bolles & Daniel E. Bailey - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):222.
Interpolation accuracy as a function of visual angle between scale marks.Charles A. Baker - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (6):433.
A failure to replicate the inhibitory effects of a second stimulus following the primary stimulus to react.James H. Koplin, Robert Fox & Frank Dozier - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):914.
On the stimulus and response in pursuit tracking.E. C. Poulton - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):189.
Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.Irving Biederman & E. Webb Stacy - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1100.
Experimental evidence for the electrical character of visual fields derived from a quantitative analysis of the Ponzo illusion.W. R. Sickles - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):84.
Changes in GSR to a single stimulus as a result of training on a compound stimulus.William W. Grings & Vsevolod N. Shmelev - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2):129.
Assumed distance as a determinant of apparent size.Fern A. Singer, Zita E. Tyer & Robert Pasnak - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (5):267-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
6 (#1,464,567)

6 months
2 (#1,204,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references