A rudimentary definition of addition

Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (3):350-354 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In [S, pp. 77–88], Smullyan introduced the class of rudimentary relations, and showed that they form a basis for the recursively enumerable sets. He also asked [S, p. 81] if the addition and multiplication relations were rudimentary. In this note we answer one of these questions by showing that the addition relation is rudimentary. This result was communicated to Smullyan orally in 1960 and is announced in [S, p. 81, footnote 1]. However, the proof has not yet appeared in print. Let us begin by reviewing Smullyan's definition [S, p. 10] of dyadic notation for the positive integers. Each positive integerais identified with the unique stringanan−1…a1a0of 1's and 2's such thata= Σin=0ai2iBecause of this identification, we are able to speak of typographical properties of numbers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Definition of “Religion”.Phillip E. Devine - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.
The Development of Freedom.Daniel O. Dahlstrom - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:35-52.
On Gilmore’s Definition of ‘Dead’.Seahwa Kim - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):105-110.
Lying and Asserting.Andreas Stokke - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (1):33-60.
Definition.Richard Robinson - 1950 - Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#553,855)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of Formal Systems.Raymond M. Smullyan - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):88-90.

Add more references