Experimental Philosophical Logic

In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 521–534 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter explores the intersection of experimental philosophy and philosophical logic. It considers a distinction between pure and applied logic. It sketches some ways in which experimental results and empirical results more broadly, can inform and have informed debates within philosophical logic. The chapter lays out a way of looking at the situation that makes plain at least one way in which people should expect experimental and logical concerns to overlap. It turns to the phenomenon of vagueness, where people can see this overlap explored and developed from multiple angles, showing just how intimately related experiment and logic can be. Logic is not only useful for exploring hypotheses about truth conditions and entailments but also for exploring hypotheses about reasoning. Logical and experiment can fruitfully interact in a variety of applications, and that is all people need for experimental philosophical logic to be worthwhile.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prospects for Experimental Philosophical Logic.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2019 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 26 (2):265–286.
Introduction.Andrew Aberdein & Matthew Inglis - 2019 - In Andrew Aberdein & Matthew Inglis (eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 1-13.
Essays on logic and its applications in philosophy.Jan Woleński (ed.) - 2011 - Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Vagueness, logic and ontology.Dominic G. Hyde - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):531-533.
Experimental Mathematics.Alan Baker - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (3):331-344.
Introduction.Lou Goble - 2017 - In The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–8.
Probability logic.Niki Pfeifer - forthcoming - In M. Knauff & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Handbook of Rationality. Cambridge, MA, USA:
Experimental Philosophy and the Philosophical Tradition.Stephen Stich & Kevin P. Tobia - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 3–21.
Projects and Methods of Experimental Philosophy.Eugen Fischer & Justin Sytsma - 2023 - In Alexander Max Bauer & Stephan Kornmesser (eds.), The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 39-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)

6 months
10 (#280,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Ripley
Monash University

Citations of this work

What is Logical Monism?Justin Clarke-Doane - forthcoming - In Christopher Peacocke & Paul Boghossian (eds.), Normative Realism.
Shrieking in the face of vengeance.Kevin Scharp - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):454-463.
The Liar Paradox in the predictive mind.Christian Michel - 2019 - Pragmatics and Cognition 26 (2-3):239-266.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references