Modeling Human Syllogistic Reasoning: The Role of “No Valid Conclusion”

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (1):446-459 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After 100+ years of studying syllogistic reasoning, what have we learned? Well, Riesterer and colleagues suggest that we have learned to throw away most of the data! If that seems like a bad idea to you then, be assured, that the authors agree with you. The sad fact is that the conclusion of “No Valid Conclusion” (NVC) is one of the most frequently selected responses in syllogistic reasoning but these “majority data” have been ignored by most researchers. Riesterer and colleagues introduce heuristic rules for predicting NVC and provide directions to modelers on how to up their game.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Aristotle's Syllogistic a Logic?Phil Corkum - forthcoming - History and Philosophy of Logic.
Aristotle, Prior analytics, book I (review). [REVIEW]Phil Corkum - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 236-237.
Conceptual Equivocation and Warrant by Reasoning.Mikkel Gerken - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):381-400.
Instrumental reasoning.John Broome - 2000 - In Julian Nida-Rümelin & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Rationality, Rules and Structure. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 195-207.
A Diagrammatic Calculus of Syllogisms.Ruggero Pagnan - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (3):347-364.
Reasoning with quantifiers.Bart Geurts - 2003 - Cognition 86 (3):223--251.
Descartes's critique of the syllogistic.Alexander Xavier Douglas - 2017 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-28

Downloads
21 (#740,927)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?