Announcing an Improvement to the Journal’s Blind Review Process

Ethics 127 (3):519-520 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/690143

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let’s Fix It.Jeffrey Overall - 2015 - Journal of Academic Ethics 13 (3):277-289.
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation.Jia Zhu, Gabriel Fung, Wai Hung Wong, Zhixu Li & Chuanhua Xu - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1073-1094.
Process Improvement in the Quality Management System: An Analysis of Carnegie Mellon's Capability Maturity Model.Walter R. Mccollum - 2004 - Dissertation, Walden University
Is the blind spot blind?C. R. Garvey - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1):83.
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process.Jo Ann Carland, James W. Carland & Carroll D. Aby - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104.
Blind spots [Book Review].Ken Wright - 2012 - The Australian Humanist (105):17.
Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement.Andrea Nadine Frolic & Katherine Drolet - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):98-103.
Face transplantation for the blind: more than being blind in a sighted world.Joseph Lee - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6):361-365.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
If the Blind Lead the Blind. A Comment on Logical Form in Professor Perry's Realistic Platform.Harold Chapman Brown - 1910 - Journal of Philosophy 7:491.
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.David B. Resnik & Susan A. Elmore - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):169-188.
The Blind Beating the Blind: An Unidentified 'Game' in a Marginal Illustration of the Romance of Alexander, MS Bodley 264.Edward Wheatley - 2005 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 68 (1):213 - 217.
Single blind placebo in drug research.P. Beck - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):477-a-477.
The perception of obstacles by the blind.Philip Worchel, Jack Mauney & John G. Andrew - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):746.
Quality improvement projects and research review.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):394-394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-28

Downloads
31 (#517,734)

6 months
7 (#436,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Henry S. Richardson
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

Intra-feminist Critique: Modes of Disengagement.Marilyn Frye - 2001 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy (2):85-87.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references