Logic and the Trinity

Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):3-18 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper gives a model of the sentences that express the core of the doctrine of the Trinity. The new elements in the model are: 1) an underlying map between "Divine Person" and "God"-- in place of set- theoretic inclusion, and 2) the notion of a predicable keeping or not keeping phase in a system of kinds. These elements, which are explained in the text, are common in everyday language. The model requires no tampering with the fundamental laws of logic, nor does it require the use of any such difficult metaphysical notions as substance and essence as distinct from person

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity.John Zeis - 1993 - Sophia 32 (1):45 - 55.
The Whole Truth.Dale M. Schlitt - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):169-182.
Time Travel and the Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):313-324.
The Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 403--429.
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
Bonaventure’s Proof of Trinity.Christopher B. Gray - 1993 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (2):201-217.
Trinity and Consistency.James Cain - 2006 - Faith and Philosophy 23 (1):45-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
68 (#241,889)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Swinburne's tritheism.Edward C. Feser - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):175-184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references