Disentangling Privacy and Intimacy: Intimate Citizenship, Private Boundaries and Public Transgressions

Human Affairs 20 (1):33-42 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Disentangling Privacy and Intimacy: Intimate Citizenship, Private Boundaries and Public Transgressions Recent theorisations of transformations of intimacy—like Ken Plummer's (2003) Intimate Citizenship project—concentrate on social and cultural transformations that erode the containment of intimacy within the private sphere. They have less to say about the character of and oppositions to that erosion, and specifically how far the idea of the private stands in opposition to intimacy transgressing into the public. In this essay, the private is explored through its constitutive features—liberal codifications of rights, liberty and property, medico-moral discourses and conservative values and legal and political regulation—to give a more political and critical reading. This reading suggests that an explicit disentangling of the private and the intimate is necessary if tendencies toward public and emancipated intimacies are to become meaningful transformations, and this involves a dissembling of and critical engagement with the powerful historically entrenched idea of privacy in western societies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral justifications for privacy and intimacy.Samuel P. Winch - 1996 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):197 – 209.
Privacy and the public/private dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Democracy and genetic privacy: The value of bodily integrity. [REVIEW]Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (1):97-103.
Mobile Snapshots and Private/Public Boundaries.Dong-Hoo Lee - 2009 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 22 (3):161-171.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
The Politics of the Personal: A Liberal Approach.Corey Brettschneider - 2007 - American Political Science Review 101 (1):19-31.
Honesty and Intimacy in Kant’s Duty of Friendship.R. Patricia C. Flynn - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Peter McHugh 1929–2010. [REVIEW]Alan Blum - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (2-3):229-229.
Privacy and social interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
49 (#326,933)

6 months
26 (#113,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Reynolds
Edge Hill University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1947 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.
Liquid Modernity.Zygmunt Bauman - 2000 - Polity Press ; Blackwell.
The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke.Crawford Brough Macpherson - 1962 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by Frank Cunningham.
On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references