Boyle, Jurieu, and the Politics of Philosophy: A Reply to Professor Popkin

In Thomas M. Lennon (ed.), Problems of Cartesianism. Institute for Research on Public Policy. pp. 83-94 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boyle on science and the mechanical philosophy: a reply to Chalmers.Andrew Pyle - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
Response to Professor Chisholm.V. C. Chappell - 1965 - The Monist 49 (1):36-37.
Philosophy Made Simple.A. Stroll & R. H. Popkin - 1956 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Avrum Stroll.
A Reply to Professor Frankena.Philippa Foot - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):455 - 459.
Richard Popkin and his history of scepticism.Jeremy D. Popkin - 2009 - In Maia Neto, José Raimundo, Gianni Paganini & John Christian Laursen (eds.), Skepticism in the modern age: building on the work of Richard Popkin. Boston: Brill.
Comments on professor Derrida's paper.Richard Popkin - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1):58-65.
Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: a reply to Anstey and Pyle.Alan Chalmers - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):187-193.
In Memoriam.[author unknown] - 2005 - The European Legacy 10 (4):269-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-15

Downloads
2 (#1,802,998)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references