Responsible Conduct in Nanomedicine Research: Environmental Concerns Beyond the Common Rule

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):848-855 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nanomedicine research raises ethical concerns beyond those covered by the Common Rule. Investigators and research institutions should comply with environmental and occupational health laws protect research staff and the environment. Though the IRB should concentrate on risks to human research participants, it should also consider risks to identifiable third parties. Investigators should also address risks to identifiable third parties. Professional and governmental organizations should deal with the long-term social, ethical, and environmental consequences of nanomedicine

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Group mentoring to Foster the responsible conduct of research.Caroline Whitebeck - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):541-558.
A Portrait of Nanomedicine and Its Bioethical Implications.Rebecca M. Hall, Tong Sun & Mauro Ferrari - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):763-779.
The responsible conduct of basic and clinical research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
The Right to Withdraw from Research.G. Owen Schaefer & Alan Wertheimer - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):329-352.
Four observations about “six domains of research ethics”.Edward J. Hackett - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
19 (#805,446)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Is the precautionary principle unscientific?David B. Resnik - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):329-344.

Add more references