Hegel on Schleiermacher and Postmodernity

Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 32 (4):457-72 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hegel's critique of Schleiermacher as the embodiment of two currents of romantic irony: empiricist skepticism (Schlegel) and feeling (Novalis), are explicitly presented as "absolute presupposition of our time". The article associates these "presuppositions" with features of postmodernity, as presented by Lyotard. Thus, the Hegelian critique of Schleiermacher might be read as a critique of postmodernity.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3138/9781442684744-011

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

De betekenis von Schleiermacher voor vandaag. De jubileumbundel over Schleiermacher van de Archivio di filosofia Schleiermacher aujourd'hui. Sur le volume consacré à Schleiermacher par la revue Archivio di Filosofia. [REVIEW]N. Schreurs - 1987 - Bijdragen 48 (1):67-74.
Schleiermacher's Hermeneutic and Its Critics: RICHARD L. CORLISS.Richard L. Corliss - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):363-379.
Schleiermacher, Realism, and Epistemic Modesty: A Reply to my Critics.Jacqueline Mariña - 2010 - In Brent Sockness & Wilhelm Gräb (eds.), Schleiermacher, the Study of Religion, and the Future of Theology. de Gruyter.
Gadamers verständnis und missverständnis Von Schleiermacher.Ben Vedder - 2003 - Bijdragen 64 (4):400-420.
More than just a ticklish subject: History, postmodernity and God.Laurence Paul Hemming - 2001 - Heythrop Journal 42 (2):192–204.
On 'nothing to distinguish' Schleiermacher and Otto: reply to Smith.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):449-468.
Schleiermacher's soliloquies: an English translation of the Monologen, with a critical introduction and appendix.Friedrich Schleiermacher - 1926 - Westport, Conn.: Hyperion Press. Edited by Horace Leland Friess.
Schleiermacher on the Philosopher’s Stone: the Shaping of Schleiermacher’s Early Ethics by the Kantian Legacy.Jacqueline Mariña - 1999 - Journal of Religion 79 (2):193-215.
Planning in/for postmodernity.Edward Soja - 1997 - In Georges Benko & Ulf Strohmayer (eds.), Space and social theory: interpreting modernity and postmodernity. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 236--249.
On ‘nothing to distinguish’ Schleiermacher and Otto: Reply to Smith: Andrew Dole.Andrew Dole - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):449-468.
Feeling of absolute dependence or absolute feeling of dependence? (What Schleiermacher really said and why it matters).Georg Behrens - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (4):471-481.
Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics.James M. Brandt - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Introduction.Jacqueline Marina - 2005 - In Jacqueline Mariña (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Pious Spirit.Patrick Donald Dinsmore - 1993 - Dissertation, Drew University
Postmodernity's transcending: devaluing God.Laurence Paul Hemming - 2005 - Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-28

Downloads
178 (#109,927)

6 months
93 (#48,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Reid
University of Ottawa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references