Scientific realism vs. constructive empiricism: A dialogue

The Monist 65 (3):336 - 349 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Notice that I’m not saying that observations we in fact have made are not relevant to our beliefs about what exists. But the mere fact that something is observable does not give us any reason to think that it ever has or will in fact be observed. The issue between us is whether mere observability—as distinct from actual observation—is relevant to our beliefs about what exists. I submit that it is not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
275 (#75,094)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Gutting
Last affiliation: University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Underdetermination and Realism.Michael Devitt - 2002 - Philosophical Issues 12 (1):26-50.
Van Fraassen's instrumentalism.Alan Mcmichael - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):257-272.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references